` comment markers. See TODO/tech/TODO_deploy.md §2. -->

The Mirror Collector

The collection had begun with a single mirror. Professor Hardin often traced it back to that afternoon in the auction house — a minor sale, provincial, attended mostly by dealers and a few bored pensioners — when he had paid eleven pounds for a Victorian dressing mirror with a foxed glass and a walnut frame that was missing one of its finials. He had bought it because it was cheap and because his study was a room that needed a mirror and because he was thirty-four years old and had not yet learned what the mirrors in his possession were capable of showing.

He discovered it by accident, as you discover most things that subsequently alter your understanding of what the world contains. He was sitting at his desk, working on the paper that would eventually establish his modest academic reputation, and he glanced up at the mirror and saw it: not his study, not the window behind him, not his own reflection in the afternoon light. He saw himself at a hospital bedside — his father's bedside, he understood immediately, though the scene was not a memory of any particular visit — and what he saw was himself leaving. Turning away. Walking toward a door that was already closing.

His father had died two weeks after that actual visit. Hardin had not been in the country. He had been at a conference in Vienna, where he had given a paper that had been warmly received, and for eleven years the reception of that paper had competed in his mind with the knowledge of where he had been when his father died. The mirror showed him the leaving — just the leaving, precisely framed, with a quality of light that was not the quality of memory but something sharper and more deliberate, as if lit for examination.

He turned away from it quickly. By the end of the week he had covered it with a cloth. By the end of the month he had taken the cloth off again, because the question of whether it would happen again was more urgent than his preference for not seeing the answer.


It happened once more, with the same mirror, and then not again. He concluded — provisionally, in the manner of a careful academic — that the event was either a property of the object or a property of his relationship to the object at a specific time. He began acquiring other mirrors to test the proposition.

It took him six years and thirty-one mirrors to establish the pattern. Each mirror showed something once, to each person who looked into it at what Hardin came to think of as the right moment — not a moment of the mirror's choosing, precisely, but a moment when the viewer's unresolved history was available to the glass in some way he could not quantify and did not try to. The images were always scenes of departure, of turning away, of the precise moment at which something had been left unfinished.

The mirrors showed regret, but only the specific kind: not the regret of having done the wrong thing, but the regret of having been present at the right moment and having looked away from it.

He began keeping records. He invited colleagues, cautiously, under pretexts that were not precisely dishonest, to sit in his study and describe what they saw. He photographed and catalogued each mirror with the same methodical attention he gave to archival material. He submitted nothing for publication. He was a rational man in a profession that valued rationality, and he understood that the question of what to do with knowledge that could not be contained within existing frameworks was itself a problem that required more thought than the knowledge itself had yet produced.


By the time of his retirement, the collection comprised forty-seven mirrors. They occupied an entire room of his house — the largest room, formerly the sitting room, now lined floor to ceiling with frames in oak and mahogany and gilt and wrought iron and plain pine, each one placed at a slight angle so they did not reflect each other. He had learned early not to let them see each other. The one time he had positioned two mirrors in mutual reflection by accident, both had shown images simultaneously, overlapping, and he had not been able to look away for eleven minutes. He had not attempted to describe what the overlap had shown him. Some things were more efficiently stored in the body than in language.

He did not look in the mirrors himself any longer. He had made this decision at fifty-seven, after the fourth mirror produced an image that he had not had the faculty to process without a period of some weeks' difficulty. His doctor had attributed the difficulty to overwork. Hardin had not corrected this assessment.

What he did instead was sit in the room, occasionally, in the chair he had placed at its centre — facing no mirror directly, equidistant from all of them — and read. He found that reading in the company of forty-seven objects that were each, in some sense, attentive produced a quality of concentration that his study no longer provided. It was not comfortable. But it was, he had come to believe, accurate. The mirrors had taught him one thing with more consistency than any other: that looking away from something did not change its shape. It only changed who was looking.

He had learned to sit with what he knew. He considered this, at seventy-one, to be a late but significant acquisition.

?     ?     ?

The Mystical Sanctum

The Mirrors Are a Relic Set

In the browser RPG Avalon, the Hardin Mirrors are scattered across the Mystical Sanctum. Each mirror reveals a hidden memory when touched during the correct quest stage. Collecting all seven unlocks the Regret Archive — a powerful but dangerous source of lost knowledge.

Seek the Mirrors →

Reader Questions

Frequently Asked

What do mirrors symbolise in folklore and the occult?

Mirrors have been associated with the soul, truth, and the uncanny across many cultures — from the ancient belief that a mirror captures a portion of its subject’s essence, to the superstition that breaking a mirror brings seven years’ misfortune. In many traditions, mirrors were covered after a death to prevent the soul of the deceased from becoming trapped. The Victorian occult revival treated mirrors as potential scrying instruments — windows onto other times and states. The idea that mirrors show something more accurate or more dangerous than ordinary reflection is one of the oldest and most persistent of supernatural beliefs.

What do Professor Hardin’s mirrors actually show?

Each mirror shows the viewer a precise, lit scene of their own regret — not the regret of having done the wrong thing, but the specific regret of having been present at the right moment and having looked away from it. The first mirror shows Hardin himself leaving his dying father’s hospital bedside. Each mirror shows this image once, to each viewer, at what Hardin calls “the right moment,” when their unresolved history is somehow available to the glass. The images are not memories but something sharper: lit for examination, not for comfort.

Why does Hardin stop looking in the mirrors himself?

Hardin stops after a fourth mirror produces an image he cannot process without weeks of psychological difficulty — the implication being that the accumulation of regret-images reaches a threshold beyond which a person cannot function normally. He stops not from lack of curiosity but from self-preservation. The decision is the careful academic’s belated acknowledgement that some knowledge costs more than it yields, and it represents a significant shift in his relationship to the collection he has spent his career building.

What is the significance of sitting at the centre of the mirror room?

Hardin’s habit of sitting equidistant from all forty-seven mirrors — facing none of them directly — is a way of being in the presence of the collection without being subject to it. He finds that the quality of attention the mirrors produce is better for his reading and his thinking than ordinary solitude, because it is accurate rather than comfortable. He is learning to sit with what he knows, which the story presents as the most significant thing a person can learn to do.

Why did Hardin keep his findings from academic publication?

Hardin is a rational man in a rational profession and understands that knowledge which cannot be contained within existing frameworks creates a problem that requires more thought than the knowledge itself has produced. He also understands, implicitly, what publishing would do to his reputation and his ability to continue the work. His decision to document carefully without publishing is the choice of a man who values the work more than the credit for it.

What is the psychological theme at the heart of this story?

The story’s central proposition is that looking away from something does not change its shape — it only changes who is looking. Hardin spends his career studying the precise moments at which people looked away from something important, and his late achievement is learning not to look away from what he has found. The mirrors are instruments of enforced honesty, and the collection is a life’s work in confronting the cost of avoidance.

How does the collector obsession in fiction typically function as a horror device?

Collector narratives in horror frequently use the accumulation of objects as a metaphor for obsession’s cost — the collector becomes defined by the collection, loses the capacity for ordinary life, and is eventually consumed by what they have gathered. Hardin’s story inverts this somewhat: his obsession is methodical and self-aware, and the collection ultimately teaches him something. But the room lined floor to ceiling with mirrors, each one attended to, each one a potential source of unwanted clarity, retains the horror genre’s sense of a life colonised by its objects.

What happens when two mirrors face each other in the story?

The one time Hardin positions two mirrors in mutual reflection by accident, both produce images simultaneously, overlapping, and he cannot look away for eleven minutes. He does not describe what the overlap showed him, only that some things are “more efficiently stored in the body than in language.” This is the story’s most extreme suggestion of what the mirrors are capable of — that their combined attention produces something beyond even Hardin’s capacity to process or articulate.

Who is M. Ashford and what else have they written for Portal Avalon?

M. Ashford writes in the Mystical Horror category for Portal Avalon, specialising in stories that use uncanny objects as the primary vehicle of the supernatural. Portal Avalon authors use initials as a house style. “The Mirror Collector” was published in April 2026. Readers who respond to Ashford’s approach to objects with accumulated knowledge may also enjoy the related story “The Clockwork Oracle” by E. Crane, which similarly concerns an artefact that provides unwelcome accuracy rather than comfort.

Are the Hardin mirrors connected to the Avalon game world?

Yes — in the browser RPG Avalon that Portal Avalon hosts, the Hardin Mirrors are scattered as a relic set across the Mystical Sanctum. Each mirror reveals a hidden memory when touched during the correct quest stage, and collecting all seven unlocks the Regret Archive — a powerful but dangerous source of lost knowledge. Reading the story provides lore context for the mirrors’ behaviour and the cost of engaging with the Archive.

❖ ❖ ❖

Join the Circle

Receive the Whispers

New stories, editors' picks, and exclusive content — delivered to your inbox.

For adults 18+ only. Unsubscribe at any time.

▶ Play Avalon